Already an account? Log in

    Try Tax Rendement

    With 13 published issues in a calendar year Tax Rendement offers the most up to date answers to your professional questions with news, themes and articles.

    Subscribe to Tax Rendement for the next three months for only € 3, excluding VAT (normal price is € 99 per year). This offer applies to a business trial subscription, valid until cancellation.

    Fill out the form below and subscribe

    Are you interested in similar English publications? Rendement also offers (for HR professionals), (about Dutch payroll regulations) and (about Dutch financial SME-news). Try these publications for three months each for € 3, excluding VAT. Normal price is €99 per year.

    Promo code (when available)

    We ask you to agree to our General Terms and Conditions and read our Privacy Policy.

    When clicking on subscribe, you automatically give permission to receive the newsletter and offers, with which we inform you about relevant products and services of Rendement Uitgeverij BV. If you do not want this, please contact us via You can also withdraw the consent at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of each email.

    Additional assessment after 12 years allowed

    The Supreme Court has ruled that a period of twelve years for an additional assessment for gift tax applying to foreign-source income and wealth is not in conflict with EU law. The tax authorities may impose a revised assessment for taxes wrongly unpaid, albeit subject to time limits. The time limit is five years for domestic-source income and wealth. For foreign-source income and wealth the time limit is twelve years.

    Bank balances

    The case concerned was a woman who had been given an amount from Swiss bank assets by her father in 1998 which she failed to declare. An additional tax assessment for 1998 gift tax was imposed on her. The woman believed EU law was misapplied as the tax assessment had not been imposed until 17 years later. The Supreme Court stated that a term of 12 years for an additional assessment was not in conflict with EU law. The court argued that if the extended additional tax assessment period applicable to IB and VB is not in conflict with EU law, the same applies to the additional tax assessment period of gift tax. And if savings and income from assets have been concealed from member state tax authorities and there are no clues as to their existence, the member state concerned can apply a longer additional tax assessment period if these assets are held in another member state than if they are held in the member state first mentioned. In conclusion, the appeal in cassation was dismissed.

    Supreme Court, September 9, 2020, ECLI (abridged): 1600

    Share this article on: