Already an account? Log in

    Try Tax Rendement

    With 13 published issues in a calendar year Tax Rendement offers the most up to date answers to your professional questions with news, themes and articles.

    Subscribe to Tax Rendement for the next three months for only € 3, excluding VAT (normal price is € 99 per year). This offer applies to a business trial subscription, valid until cancellation.

    Fill out the form below and subscribe

    Are you interested in similar English publications? Rendement also offers (for HR professionals), (about Dutch payroll regulations) and (about Dutch financial SME-news). Try these publications for three months each for € 3, excluding VAT. Normal price is €99 per year.

    Promo code (when available)

    We ask you to agree to our General Terms and Conditions and read our Privacy Policy.

    When clicking on subscribe, you automatically give permission to receive the newsletter and offers, with which we inform you about relevant products and services of Rendement Uitgeverij BV. If you do not want this, please contact us via You can also withdraw the consent at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of each email.

    Defaulting on interest payments will cost dearly

    It is easy for a director and major shareholder (dga) to make arrangements with his own privately held corporation (bv). But it is not quite without obligations, as the dga found out in the case below. In this case, the dga had a current account with his company, and it was agreed that the company would receive 5% interest annually on the balance of the account. But the dga failed to pay that interest in 2015 and 2016. The tax inspector regarded this as a profit distribution to the dga, and attributed it to box 2 income. The dga argued it was not a profit distribution because the money had not ‘left the company definitively’. The court gave short shrift to this. It was agreed that the dga would pay 5% interest. But that could not be retraced. The interest had not been calculated, paid or credited, nor did it appear as income in the records. Therefore, the company had missed out and the dga had saved. The court concluded from the exhibits that both the dga and the company were aware of the fact that the bv had been favored. Thus, the unpaid interest was rightly a taxed profit distribution.

    Court of Gelderland, June 28, 2021, (publication date August 18, 2021)  ECLI (abridged): 32482

    Share this article on: