Already an account? Log in

    Try Tax Rendement

    With 13 published issues in a calendar year Tax Rendement offers the most up to date answers to your professional questions with news, themes and articles.

    Subscribe to Tax Rendement for the next three months for only € 3, excluding VAT (normal price is € 99 per year). This offer applies to a business trial subscription, valid until cancellation.

    Fill out the form below and subscribe

    Are you interested in similar English publications? Rendement also offers (for HR professionals), (about Dutch payroll regulations) and (about Dutch financial SME-news). Try these publications for three months each for € 3, excluding VAT. Normal price is €99 per year.

    Promo code (when available)

    We ask you to agree to our General Terms and Conditions and read our Privacy Policy.

    When clicking on subscribe, you automatically give permission to receive the newsletter and offers, with which we inform you about relevant products and services of Rendement Uitgeverij BV. If you do not want this, please contact us via You can also withdraw the consent at any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of each email.

    No exemption for healthy lunches

    A healthy lunch does not fall under the specific exemption for provisions under the Working Conditions Act. This was recently decided by the Court of The Hague. The employer in this case found that the healthy lunch meals he provided to his employees were specifically exempt. According to him, his Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment and his Plan of Action showed that the lunch meals were a relevant, essential and integral part of his working conditions and prevention policy. But the Court ruled that the lunches did not constitute provisions that arose directly from the employer’s working conditions policy under the Working Conditions Act. Moreover, the Court ruled that it mattered that the wage tax contains a facility for the valuation of meals at the workplace (based on a standard amount). Therefore, a specific exemption did not apply. The final levy the man had to pay for exceeding the tax-free margin was upheld.

    Court of The Hague, June 23, 2021, ECLI (abridged): 6986 

    Share this article on: